Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Dohrman et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Duane Dohrman, Donald McCain, Joanne McMahon and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Herbert Pringle v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 22-2091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HERBERT LEE PRINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Pringle v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2021cv02635
Plaintiff:
Herbert Lee Pringle
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Addington et al v. Southport Marina, Inc.
as 7:2021cv00107
Plaintiff:
Coleman Shaughnessy, Richard Burke, Deborah Turlington and others
Counter Defendant:
Joseph Griffin, Rodney James Hyson, John Scism and others
Defendant:
Southport Marina, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Matthews v. US Government
as 6:2020cv02272
Plaintiff:
Herbert Lee Matthews, Jr
Defendant:
US Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. US Government IRS
as 6:2020cv00129
Plaintiff:
Herbert Lee Matthews, Jr
Defendant:
US Government IRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childs v. USA
as 7:2019cv81401
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Herbert Lee Childs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MARTIN v. USA
as 1:2019cv00495
Petitioner:
HERBERT LEE MARTIN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MARTIN v. USA
as 1:2018cv00372
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
HERBERT LEE MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Herbert Matthews, Jr. v. J. McFadden
as 17-7427
Petitioner - Appellant:
HERBERT LEE MATTHEWS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN J. MCFADDEN
Respondent:
ALAN WILSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
