Cases 21 - 30 of 701
Hernandez v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2023cv03212
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Hernandez, Jr.
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Anderson v Hernandez, et al.
as 4:2023cv00794
Plaintiff:
Jeffery L Anderson
Defendant:
Joseph T Hernandez, Amy Johnson and Wes Drury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hernandez v. Adams
as 4:2023cv01236
Petitioner:
Rey Juan Hernandez
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02818
Plaintiff:
Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant:
3M Company
David Hernandez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2824
Petitioner:
David Torres Hernandez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Salvador Nunez-Hernandez v. United States
as 23-2801
Petitioner / Appellant:
Salvador Nunez-Hernandez
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
United States v. Gustavo Gutierrez Hernandez
as 23-2776
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Gustavo Gutierrez Hernandez, also known as Gustavo Hernandez Gutierrez, also known as Gustavo Hernandez-Gutierrez
United States v. Cesar Avila-Hernandez
as 23-2549
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Cesar Ramon Avila-Hernandez, also known as Caesar Ramon Avila Hernandez
Shoemaker et al v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Shoemaker, Andrea L. Arroyo, Benjamin Atwell and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
