Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 742
Hewlett-Packard Company
as 2:2020cv05160
Cochran v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01235
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP Enterprise Services, LLC, Perspecta Enterprise Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Daniel Cochran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag
Technology Properties Limited, LLC v. Canon, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv03640
Consolidated Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company, Rosewill Inc., Shuttle Computer Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: MCM Portfolio LLC and Technology Properties Limited LLC
Not Classified By Court: Kwan Chan, SanDisk Corporation and Arockiyaswamy Venkidu
Defendant: Canon U.S.A., Inc. and Canon Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: SD-3C LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
In Re: Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Foreign Exchange Transactions Litigation
as 1:2012md02335
Defendant: Arthur Certosimo, Michael J. Kowalski, Samuel C. Scott, III and others
Plaintiff: Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, Lisa Parker, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Retirement Plan and others
Claimant: Bridgestone Americas, Inc., Bechtel Corporation, SYNNEX Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, United States Of America and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Bart Florence, Paul Bensi, Jerry Kalmer and others
Petitioner: Union Asset Management Holding AG, Ironworkers Locals 40, 361 & 417 - Union Security Funds, DeKalb County Pension Fund and others
Interested Party: David Nichols
Nominal Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Not Classified By Court: Non-Party June Kim
Lead Plaintiff: State of Oregon By and Through the Oregon State Treasurer on Behalf of the Common School Fund and, Together with the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Board, on Behalf of the Oregon Public Employee Re
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Speed Track, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1573
Defendant / Appellee: MACYS.COM, LLC, B&H FOTO & ELECTRONICS CORP., BEST BUY.COM LLC and others
Defendant: POCAHONTAS CORP, NA TECH DIRECT, INC., J&R ELECTRONICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SPEED TRACK, INC.
Defendant / Cross Appellant: IMEDIA BRANDS, INC., fka Value Vision International, Inc., dba ShopNBC.com
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Toshiba Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-20235
Plaintiff / Appellee: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Defendant / Appellant: QUANTA STORAGE, INCORPORATED
Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Alcatel-Lucent S.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv00163
Defendant: Alcatel-Lucent S.A, Alcatel-Lucent Holdings, Inc., Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Chrimar Systems, Inc, Chrimar Systems, Inc. and Chrimar Holding Company, LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Hewlett Packard Company and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Consolidated Defendant: AMX, LLC
Not Classified By Court: James Knowles and David Keyzer
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Speed Track, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 20-1660
Defendant / Appellant: DELL, INC., RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT, INC., OVERSTOCK.COM, INC. and others
Defendant: NA TECH COMPUTER SUPPLIES INC., BARNESANDNOBLE.COM, INC., SYX NORTH AMERICAN TECH HOLDINGS LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SPEED TRACK, INC.
Caccavale et al v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00974
Plaintiff: Tony Caccavale and Anthony Mangelli
Defendant: Unisys Corporation, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Co. and Hewlett-Packard Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00954
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?