Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Offley v. Fashion Nova, LLC
as 1:2022cv10603
Plaintiff:
Amanda Offley, Jamie Dumelle, Lucy Massa and others
Defendant:
Fashion Nova, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hines v. Atrium Medical Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv00531
Plaintiff:
Louise Hines
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corp., Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Murray v. State Warden et al
as 1:2019cv12179
Petitioner:
James Murray and James Hines
Respondent:
Commowealth of Massachusetts and State Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Merchia v. Virginia Board of Medicine, et al
as 19-1571
Defendant / Appellee:
GERALD A. MILSKY, J.D., SHEVAUN ROUKOUS, J.D., SIOBHAN DUNNAVANT, M.D. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PANKAJ MERCHIA
R.I. Seekonk Holdings, LLC. et al v. Hines
as 1:2019cv10230
Plaintiff:
R.I. Seekonk Holdings, LLC., Charles H. Tapalian and H Charles Tapalian, Sr.
Defendant:
Michelle A. Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reade v. Gants et al
as 1:2018cv12514
Defendant:
Judge Robert C. Rufo, Barbara A. Lenk, Assistant Clerk John Dale and others
Plaintiff:
William F Reade, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
