Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Humes v. Starks et al
as 2:2023cv02818
Plaintiff:
Tameka Humes
Defendant:
Shawn Starks and J.D. & Billy Hines Trucking, Inc.
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hines et al v. ONEW Company, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02491
Plaintiff:
Danielle Hines, Kelsie Noel and Kayleigh Sawyer
Defendant:
ONEW Company, LLC, ONEW Company TN, LLC, ONEW Company AL, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hines v. Krystal Restaurants, LLC
as 1:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Hines
Defendant:
Krystal Restaurants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hines v. Tennessee Dept of Corrections
as 1:2022cv01286
Plaintiff:
Channing Hines
Defendant:
Tennessee Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. K025 Kroger East/Delta et al
as 2:2022cv02546
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Ossie Hines
Defendant:
K025 Kroger East/Delta, Kroger Limited Partnership I, Kroger Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hines v. InSouth Bank et al
as 1:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
Tyler Hines
Defendant:
InSouth Bank and Rawls Funeral Home
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
