Cases 21 - 30 of 72
It Works Marketing, Inc. v. Melaleuca Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv01743
Defendant:
Brandon Olive, Katie Harold, Sarah Rankin and others
Plaintiff:
It Works Marketing, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Amanda Gully
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
HOERNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv62195
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LUKE HOERNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOERNER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2020cv00975
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HOERNER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
White v. Matthews et al
as 1:2020cv00264
Plaintiff:
Sheila White and Sheila Ann White
Defendant:
Linda Woods, Robert Wilkie, Gulf Coast Veterans Health Care System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mikhail Tsukerman v. Western Community Unit School, et al
as 19-3075
Defendant / Appellee:
CONNIE THOMAS, Western High School Principal, THOMAS HUNTER, LAW FIRM OF BECKER, HOERNER, THOMPSON & YSURA, Attorneys for Western CUSD's and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKHAIL TSUKERMAN
Abdou et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11856
Plaintiff:
Abdou Mohamed, Rodolfo Salcedo, John Hurley and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Fahs v. Swift et al
as 3:2018cv00079
Plaintiff:
Dillan C. Fahs
Defendant:
Gerald Swift, Alicia, Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosa-Diaz v. Harry et al
as 1:2017cv02215
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rosa-Diaz
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, B. Ritchey, Jennifer Digby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITWILER et al v. MERCER COUNTY BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 1:2017cv00271
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA MARIE LITWILER and VICTOR ROSS LITWILER
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, STEPHANIE MONG, JAMES MASTTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
