Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
USA v. Jocelyn Benson, et al
as 26-1225
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOCELYN BENSON, in her official capacity as Secretary of the State of Michigan and STATE OF MICHIGAN
Intervenor: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS, DONALD DUQUETTE and others
Amicus Curiae: CENTER FOR ELECTION CONFIDENCE, INC., RESTORING INTEGRITY AND TRUST IN ELECTIONS, INC., HONEST ELECTIONS PROJECT and others
VoteAmerica, et al v. Schwab, et al
as 25-3138
Plaintiff: VOTEAMERICA and VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER
Defendant: SCOTT SCHWAB, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Kansas, KRIS KOBACH, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Kansas and STEPHEN HOWE, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Johnson County
Amicus Curiae: PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Kansans for Constitutional Freedom v. Kobach et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2025cv02265
Plaintiff: Kansans for Constitutional Freedom
Defendant: Kris Kobach, Nicholas Hale, Samuel Klaassen and others
Amicus Curiae: Americans for Public Trust and Honest Elections Project, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jefferson Griffin v. North Carolina State Board of Elections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 25-1018
Plaintiff: JEFFERSON GRIFFIN
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Amicus Curiae: NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, BIPARTISAN FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, NORTH CAROLINA VOTERS and others
Jefferson Griffin v. North Carolina Alliance for Retired Americans
as 25-1019
Intervenor: TANYA WEBSTER-DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS, SARAH SMITH and others
Plaintiff: JEFFERSON GRIFFIN
Amicus Curiae: NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, BIPARTISAN FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, NORTH CAROLINA VOTERS and others
Jefferson Griffin v. Allison Riggs
as 25-1024
Intervenor: ALLISON JEAN RIGGS
Plaintiff: JEFFERSON GRIFFIN
Amicus Curiae: NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, BIPARTISAN FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, NORTH CAROLINA VOTERS and others
Get Loud Arkansas, et al v. John Thurston, et al
as 24-2810
Defendant: John Thurston, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Arkansas State Board of Election Commissioners, Betsy Harrell, in her official capacity as Benton County Clerk, Becky Lewallen, in her official capacity as Washington County Clerk and others
Appellant: Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections, Inc., Center for Election Confidence, Inc. and Honest Elections Project
Plaintiff: Vote.org, Nikki Pastor, Trinity Blake Loper and others
Type: Civil Rights Voting
OPAWL - Building AAPI Feminist Leadership et al v. Yost et al
as 2:2024cv03495
Amicus Curiae: Honest Elections Project and AMERICANS FOR PUBLIC TRUST
Defendant: Dave Yost and Frank LaRose
Plaintiff: John Gerrath, Peter Quilligan, Elisa Bredendiek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans, et al v. Clean Elections USA, et al
as 22-16689
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARIZONA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and VOTO LATINO
Defendant / Appellee: CLEAN ELECTIONS USA, MELODY JENNINGS and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Doe Defendants 110
Amicus Curiae: THE HONEST ELECTIONS PROJECT and RESTORING INTEGRITY AND TRUST IN ELECTIONS INC.
Arkansas United, et al v. John Thurston, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-2918
Plaintiff: Arkansas United and L. Mireya Reith
Defendant: John Thurston, in his official capacity as the Secretary of State of Arkansas, Sharon Brooks, in her official capacity as a member of the Arkansas State Board of Election Commissioners, Bilenda Harris-Ritter, in her official capacity as a member of the Arkansas State Board of Election Commissioners and others
Appellant: State of Nebraska, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Amicus Curiae: United States
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?