Cases 21 - 30 of 246
HOOVER EL v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00271
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Canty v. Corizon Health et al
as 1:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Dafon Canty
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Holly Hoover NP, Joe Barret DR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BELTON v. FIELDS
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
DARREN S. BELTON
Defendant:
RONNIE FIELDS, BILL FLINT, MS. GARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abbeville First Bank v. Hoover Treated Wood Products Inc
as 8:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Abbeville First Bank
Defendant:
Hoover Treated Wood Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hoover v. State of South Carolina
as 0:2022cv04498
Petitioner:
Mr. Billy G. Hoover
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Director, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH-EL BEY v. MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MOORE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE/DEPT., BILL FLINT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. Horry County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2022cv02962
Plaintiff:
William John Hoover, Jr
Defendant:
Horry County Sheriff's Office, Phillip Thompson, Marcus Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hoover v. R.C.S.D.
as 3:2022cv02937
Plaintiff:
Billy G. Hoover and Glenn
Defendant:
R.C.S.D., Donald W. Robinson, Justin Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wayne Resper v. YesCare Corp.
as 22-7021
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE RESPER
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INCORPORATED, HOLLY HOOVER, NP, SUSAN PRYOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
