Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00319
Petitioner:
Horace Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Morgan et al
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Quinterious Williams
Defendant:
Coy Morgan, Officer Horace Jackson and Det. Horace Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20938
Plaintiff:
HORACE JACKSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JACKSON IV v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv43154
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PIERRE WILLIAM HORACE JACKSON IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2018cv11967
Plaintiff:
Shyron Franklin , Helene White , P. T.1 and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D. SNYDER , Flint, City of, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv58479
Plaintiff:
HORACE JACKSON
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Horace Jackson et al v. Citigroup Inc et al
as 2:2010cv04310
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Bernice Jackson and Horace Jackson
United States of America et al v. A Temporary Right To Enter Upon Lands In Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2009cv00092
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant:
A Temporary Right To Enter Upon Lands In Bedford County, Tennessee, Horace Jackson Brown and Sarah Frances Brown
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 946 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Horace Jackson Ponds, et al. v. ACandS, Inc., et al.
as NCM/1:01-CV-00489
Defendant:
ACandS, Inc
Plaintiff:
Horace Jackson Ponds
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
