Cases 41 - 50 of 946
Carl BellIn re: Carl Bell
as 23-2828
Petitioner:
In re: CARL EDWARD BELL
Respondent:
KIM ARDERY, Medical Care Suoervisor/CHCA at SCI-Benner Township, MORRIS HOUSER, Superintendent, GEORGE LITTLE, Secretary of Department of Corrections and others
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv00248
Petitioner:
Andy Ortiz
Respondent:
BM. Zborovancik, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Original Thai Massage et al v. City of Lomita et al
as 2:2023cv06884
Plaintiff:
Original Thai Massage and Suki Soh
Defendant:
Brianna Rindge, Michelle Houser, Will Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
Andy Ortiz
Defendant:
BM. Zborovancik, John Doe, Dan Caro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUSER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08460
Plaintiff:
JORDAN HOUSER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOUSER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33692
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN HOUSER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCKELVIE v. HOUSER
as 2:2023cv03733
Petitioner:
DARRELL MCKELVIE
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOUSER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13580
Plaintiff:
WILLIE HOUSER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOUSER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13332
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HOUSER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
