Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv00470
Plaintiff:
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company and Burberry Limited, a New York corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", sedefmermer.org, Liu Hua Liang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Liang v. Lynch
as 16-3247
Petitioner:
Xun Hua Liang
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General
Coach, Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2015cv02994
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Xiong Guiyan, Jing Zhou and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Bell v. Parker et al
as 3:2014cv00444
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Bell
Defendant:
Catherine Parker, Xiaomei Wang, Beverly Dawn Trca-Kitchen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
TAO et al v. THE NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2012cv02634
Plaintiff:
CHUN-KIT TAO and HUA LIANG
Defendant:
THE NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, ABC COMPANIES 1-10, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Au et al v. IPEX Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv02445
Defendant:
IPEX Inc. , IPEX USA LLC and Ipex Company
Plaintiff:
William Au and Jian-Hua Liang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AU et al v. IPEX Inc. et al
as 2:2010at01634
Defendant:
IPEX Inc. and IPEX USA LLC
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM AU and JIAN-HUA LIANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Au et al v. IPEX Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03028
Defendant:
IPEX Inc. , IPEX USA LLC and IPEX Company
Plaintiff:
William Au and Jian-Hua Liang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
