Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Danny Huff v. Canterbury Park Holding Corp.
as 23-3151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Danny Scott Huff
Defendant / Appellee:
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation
Huff v. Canterbury Park Holding Corporation
as 0:2022cv01922
Plaintiff:
Danny Huff
Defendant:
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Huff v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2020cv02131
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Douglas Huff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Huff v. Preferred Family Healthcare Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv00193
Defendant:
Quapaw House Inc and Preferred Family Healthcare Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Randal Huff, Kelli Ledbetter, Tina Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Salah v. Diamond Crystal Brands, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00236
Plaintiff:
Omar Salah
Defendant:
Diamond Crystal Brands, Inc. and Cliff Huff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Ashurst et al v. J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00803
Plaintiff:
Stahr Ashurst , Valerie Arrocha , LeAnn M. Belew and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services, LLC , JP Morgan Chase & Co. , J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Ashurst et al v. J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv01244
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services, LLC , JP Morgan Chase & Co. , J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Stahr Ashurst , Valerie Arrocha , LeAnn M. Belew and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Huff v. Pinstripes, Inc.
as 0:2011cv03681
Plaintiff:
Jamal Huff
Defendant:
Pinstripes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Allen et al v. Pulaski County
as 4:2010cv01514
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen , Sharon D Anderson , Matthew D Arivette and others
Defendant:
Pulaski County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
