Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 (a) Writ of Mandamus
Abraham Atachbarian Roth IRA v. Synutra International, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01302
Plaintiff:
Abraham Atachbarian Roth IRA
Defendant:
Synutra International, Inc., Liang Zhang, Yalin Wu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Perez v. Merryton Bossier L L C et al
as 5:2016cv01596
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Merryton Bossier L L C and Hui Li Ping
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Li v. Legend 72, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv06185
Plaintiff:
Zhen Hui Li
Defendant:
Legend 72, LLC, Jia Xing Yang and Sizhi Li
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LI v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv00486
Plaintiff:
HUI LI
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Li v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv07926
Plaintiff:
Hui Li
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
LI v. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
HUI LI
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA and UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
SANCHEZ v. LI'S SUPER BUFFET, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00807
Defendant:
HUANG MEI JIAN, HUI LI, LI'S SUPER BUFFET, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ELOY SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Vermilyea v. Sinohub, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv09098
Plaintiff:
Eileen M Vermilyea
Defendant:
Sinohub, Inc., Henry T. Cochran, De Hui Li and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Saad v. Sinohub, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv08725
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Saad
Defendant:
Sinohub, Inc., Henry T. Cochran, De Hui Li and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
