Cases 1 - 10 of 12
TARAZONA CARVAJAL et al v. MIJELUM, L.L.C.
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
AURELIO TARAZONA CARVAJAL, EDUAR HURTADO GARCIA, ELKIN HUMBERTO GMEZ PINTO and others
Defendant:
MIJELUM, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Oviedo v. Hernandez Rivera
as 1:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Humberto Gomez Oviedo
Defendant:
Karolina Michelle Hernandez Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gomez et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency
as 1:2021cv21712
Plaintiff:
Humberto Gomez and Julia Gomez
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001
GOMEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54522
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMUNDO HUMBERTO GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez-Torres v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv01217
Petitioner:
Carlos Humberto Gomez-Torres
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carlos Gomez-Vasquez v. Jefferson Sessions III
as 17-2020
Petitioner:
CARLOS HUMBERTO GOMEZ-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
De La Torre v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00651
Plaintiff:
Humberto Gomez De La Torre
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Miguel Gomez-Torre
as 13-20447
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL AUGUSTO GOMEZ-TORRES, also known as Miguel Gomez, also known as Miguel Augusto Gomez, also known as Miguel Augusto Gomez Torres, also known as Humberto Gomez, also known as Humberto Gomez Marroquin, also known as Miguel Gutierrez-Gonzales
Luis Gomez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-70717
Petitioner:
LUIS HUMBERTO GOMEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Humberto Gomez-Rafael v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-72086
Petitioner:
HUMBERTO GOMEZ-RAFAEL
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
