Cases 41 - 50 of 1,875
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hussein Naji v. City of Dearborn, MI, et al
as 24-1058
Plaintiff:
HUSSEIN NAJI, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ali Naji
Defendant:
CITY OF DEARBORN, MI, JOHN DOE, Officer and TIMOTHY CLIVE, Corporal
Sayidin v. Warner
as 2:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Mahamad Hussein Sayidin
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hussein v. Hussein
as 24-110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOTHANA MAHER HUSSEIN
Defendant / Appellee:
MOTHANA HUSSEIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lang v. Clinton et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Jason William Lang
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Andrew Mark Cuomo, Barack Hussein Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allstate Insurance Co.v. Roland Rose, D.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Co., Allstate Indemnity Company, Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Roland Rose, D.C., Rose Chiropractic Health & Wellness, P.C., Christian Bannerman, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
