Cases 1 - 10 of 33
HUTCHINSON et al v. NALE et al
as 1:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
DAVID HUTCHINSON and SARAH HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
REBECCA NALE, KIMBERLY BYRUM, JAMIE JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
REITER et al v. NOEL et al
as 4:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER REITER and TIFFANY NAPIER
Defendant:
JAMEY NOEL, DONOVAN HARRID, BRADLEY KRAMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WESTMORELAND et al v. SEYMOUR, INDIANA POLICE DEPT. et al
as 4:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
JESSICA WESTMORELAND and JOHNATHAN HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
SEYMOUR, INDIANA POLICE DEPT., CRYSTAL SCHAPSON, ANTHONY DESENDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Pearson, E Lowe, Croft and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv01146
Defendant:
CRAWFORD, RUDOLPH, UNKNOWN OFFICERS WORKING 2-D THIS DATE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMARRIS LEWIS, STEPHEN HUTCHINSON, JAMES GRIFFIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHISON v. WARDEN
as 1:2021cv00682
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
RONALD HUTCHINSON and RONALD HUTCHISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04282
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Martin-Shively v. Westville Corrections Facility et al
as 3:2019cv00857
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Westville Medical Staff The, Westville Corrections Facility, John Galipeau and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel L Martin-Shively
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHINSON v. EQUIFAX, INC.
as 1:2019cv03681
Defendant:
EQUIFAX, INC.
Plaintiff:
RUBY HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUTCHINSON v. EQUIFAX, INC.
as 1:2019cv03682
Plaintiff:
EDWARD D. HUTCHINSON, SR.
Defendant:
EQUIFAX, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
