Cases 21 - 30 of 92
In Re: Perez-Soto
as 20-1851
Respondent:
ROBERTO FELIBERTI-CINTRON, Judge of the Supreme Court, ANDRES SALAS-SOLER, Judge of the Appeals Court, HON. CARLOS CANDELARIA-ROSA, Judge of The Intermediate Appeals Court of Puerto Rico and others
Petitioner:
HIRAM I. PEREZ-SOTO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00124
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Perez-Pantoja
as 4:2020cv04798
Defendant:
I. Perez-Pantoja
Plaintiff:
Glenn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2020cv04955
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, and others
Plaintiff:
MARY I PEREZ
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rael v. Pantoja et al
as 1:2020cv01932
Defendant:
I. Perez Pantoja and J. Guerra
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benzant v. Kahans Superette Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01277
Defendant:
Kahans Superette Inc., David Kahan and Tuly Kahan
Plaintiff:
Luiggy I Perez Benzant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Oliver v. Perez-Pantoja et al
as 5:2019cv07957
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Oliver
Defendant:
A. Hernandez, S. Siordia, K. Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Perez et al
as 3:2019cv01499
Defendant:
Q. Jackson, D. Coleman, S. Chat and others
Plaintiff:
Rickelldrick White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Mendoza et al
as 5:2019cv03750
Defendant:
J Mendoza, I. Perez, W Sinkovich and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bevilacqua, et al v. FDIC
as 19-1482
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, MORA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
LANGHE CORPORATION, d/b/a Restaurante Barolo
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUIS BEVILACQUA and HILDA I. PEREZ-ROSADO
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Doral Bank
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
