Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Casanova v. Pfizer and Affiliates et al
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Ashley Casanova
Defendant:
Pfizer and Affiliates, Actalent Temporary Agency and Affiliates, GRAIL INC. and Affiliates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hudson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00202
Petitioner:
Ice Tee Hudson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Casanova v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Ashley Casanova
Defendant:
President Joe Biden, Federal Government, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aparicio v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2023cv00069
Petitioner:
Antonio H. Aparicio
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security and ICE/DRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aparicio v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2023hc02020
Petitioner:
Antonio H. Aparicio
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security and DHS ICE DRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ynoa v. DHS ICE DRO
as 5:2022hc02209
Petitioner:
Ygnacio Ynoa
Respondent:
DHS ICE DRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00413
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOTHARP v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv01029
Respondent:
ICE/HOMELAND SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS, SHERIFF/WARDEN OF STANLY COUNTY, DETECTIVE A. L. ALDRIDGE and others
Petitioner:
ZANNIE J. LOTHARP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
