Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Shiyang Huang v. Brian Spector, et al
as 20-10249
Defendant / Appellee:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, a foreign limited liability company, DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE, TRUSTED ID, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM R. PORTER, JAMES MCGONNIGAL, RANDOLPH JEFFERSON CARY, III and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHIYANG HUANG, CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS, ALICE M FLOWERS and others
Amicus Curiae:
JAY EDELSON
UPF Innovations, LLC v. INTRINSIC ID, INC
as 3:2019cv02711
Plaintiff:
UPF Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
INTRINSIC ID, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
IDS Inc. v. AMResorts, LP, et al
as 2:2018cv06878
Defendant:
GBS International, Inc., AMResorts, LP, Luis Sergio Torres and others
Plaintiff:
IDS Inc.
Interested Party:
Navarro McKown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Galpern v. Equifax Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05041
Defendant:
Equifax Inc and Trusted ID, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrew Galpern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Auctus Fund, LLC v. GeneSYS ID, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv12205
Plaintiff:
Auctus Fund, LLC
Defendant:
GeneSYS ID, Inc. and Lorraine Yarde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Galpern v. Equifax Inc. et al
as CAN/5:17-cv-05265
Defendant:
Equifax Inc. and Trusted ID, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrew Galpern , Germany Davis and Malcolm B Feied
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv05265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adar Bays, LLC v. GeneSys ID, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01175
Plaintiff:
Adar Bays, LLC
Defendant:
GeneSys ID, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Advantus, Corp. v. Specialist ID, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
Advantus, Corp.
Defendant:
Specialist ID, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
