Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Ikram v. Blanche
as 26-614
Petitioner:
MUHAMMAD IKRAM and AFSHAN IKRAM
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv03251
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Alar LLC et al
as 2:2025cv02059
Defendant:
Alar LLC, Lucifer James Rose, Atif Ikram Saadia Sheikh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv02665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv40107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv21597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv10537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ikram v. Applied Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv09973
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Ali Ikram
Defendant:
Applied Therapeutics, Inc. and Shoshana Shendelman
Petitioner:
Dr. Martin Dietrich
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Wak-Ikram v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv01132
Petitioner:
Tahlal Wak-Ikram and Robert Potts
Respondent:
Kathleen Jennings and Brian Emig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
