Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Cross v. Parsec USA Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02706
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY doing business as Canadian National Railway Company also known as CN SCS, Parsec USA Inc. and CN SCS
Plaintiff:
Enrico Cross
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. City of Memphis, Tennessee, et al.
as 2:2022cv02445
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, City of Memphis, Tennessee and Zellner Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Merritt v. BASF Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company d/b/a CN, GATX Corporation, BASF Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Dalton Merritt
Sondgeroth v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 2:2020cv02383
Plaintiff:
Aaron D Sondgeroth
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Elliott et al v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2019cv02807
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
Plaintiff:
John E Shannon, Jr, Benjamin Miller, Donald W Boxx and others
Not Yet Classified:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Canadian National Railroad Company
as 2:2019cv02152
Defendant:
Canadian National Railroad Company and Illinois Central Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Tracy Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Moses v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 5:2017cv00143
Plaintiff:
William Christopher Moses
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
