Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Central Ohio UFCW Unions and Retail Employers Pension Plan et al v. Interstate Brands Corporation
as 2:2011cv01072
Plaintiff:
Central Ohio UFCW Unions and Retail Employers Pension Plan , Paul Smithberger and Sue Vandersall
Defendant:
Interstate Brands Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hyett et al v. The Kroger Company et al
as 2:2010cv00181
Plaintiff:
Victoria Hyett and David Andy Hyett
Defendant:
The Kroger Company, Interstate Brands Corporation and Darrell West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Devasier v. Interstate Brands Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00002
Plaintiff:
Loretta Devasier
Defendant:
Interstate Brands Corporation, Interstate Brands Corporation and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Teamsters Union Local 89
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carolyn Johnson v. Interstate Brands Corporation
as 08-6387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROLYN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv02077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
