Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Elizalde Castillo, et al. v. Garland
as 23-2136
Petitioner:
LAURA ELIZALDE CASTILLO, JESUS GOMEZ ELIZALDE and IGNACIO GOMEZ ELIZALDE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. French Brothers, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Mid-Continent Casualty Company
Defendant:
French Brothers, Inc., Nicole McWilliams, Robert McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Romera et al v. Mi Cocina, LTD et al
as 3:2017cv02557
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Romero , Anselmo Navarrao , Rebecca Hidalgo and others
Defendant:
Mi Cocina Ltd, M Crowd Restaurant Group Inc and M Crowd GP LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Romero et al v. Mi Cocina Ltd et al
as 3:2017cv02547
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Romero , Anselmo Navarro , Rebecca Hidalgo and others
Defendant:
Mi Cocina Ltd, M Crowd GP LLC and M Crowd Restaurant Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gomez et al v. Bogopa Madison LLC et al
as 1:2017cv05006
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Gomez
Defendant:
Bogopa Madison LLC, Tony Corona and Rodolfo Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Gomez-Beltran v. USA
as 3:2016cv01867
Petitioner:
Ignacio Gomez-Beltran
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gomez-Beltran v. USA
as 3:2013cv04686
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ignacio Gomez-Beltran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gomez et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv15778
Plaintiff:
Leslie Lee Gomez and Ignacio Gomez Vasquez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gomez et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-15778
Plaintiff:
Leslie Lee Gomez and Ignacio Gomez Vasquez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
USA v. Ignacio Gomez-Beltran
as 13-10157
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
IGNACIO GOMEZ-BELTRAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
