Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ford v. Jackson et al
as 5:2022ct03131
Plaintiff:
Jarred Javon Ford
Defendant:
Denise Jackson, Dr. Wilson, Dr. Modinat Adeleye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Tillis et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Manetiony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
Thom Tillis, Sydney Batch, Madison Cawthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KHIDR v. ECKANKAR, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00995
Defendant:
ECKANKAR, INC., TRIAD AREA ECKANKAR CENTER and BRIAN MCKENZIE
Plaintiff:
IMAN KHIDR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houp v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
David Houp
Defendant:
City Of Fayetteville , Tom Bergamine , Dale Iman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bannamon et al v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2010cv00069
Plaintiff:
Valparisia R. Bannamon and Moses W. Robinson
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, Dale Iman, Anthony G. Chavonne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bannamon et al v. Iman et al
as 5:2009cv00115
Plaintiff:
Valparisia Bannamon and Moses W. Robinson
Defendant:
Dale Iman, Anthony G. Chavonne, Wesley A. Meredith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Monroe v. City Of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2008cv00272
Plaintiff:
Tyrone A. Monroe
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville Parks & Recreation Department, Robert Barefoot, Terri Hutaff and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
