Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02794
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Shirley Stewart v. Eric Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1862
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHIRLEY ANN STEWART
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., THOMAS S. WINKOWSKI, EDWIN C. ROESSLER, Fairfax County Police Department and others
Defendant: RONALD C. MACHEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, and Wife, JASON P. MANYX, and Wife and others
Ronald Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeal
as 15-1944
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT and NICOLE ROCIO LEAL-MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, (BIA), UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, (CIS), IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, (ICE) and others
Ronald Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeals
as 15-1944
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT and NICOLE ROCIO LEAL-MENDEZ
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, (BIA), UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, (CIS), IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, (ICE) and others
Emrit et al v. U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) et al
as 1:2014cv01612
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit and Nicole Rocio Leal-Mendez
Defendant: U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2250
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Roxana Santos v. Frederick County Board We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1980
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROXANA ORELLANA SANTOS
Defendant - Appellee: FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CHARLES JENKINS, Frederick County Sheriff, in his official and individual capacity, JEFFREY OPENSHAW, Frederick County Deputy Sheriff, in his official and individual capacity and others
Defendant: JULIE L. MEYERS, former Assistant Secretary for Homeland Security of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in her official and individual capacity, CALVIN MCCORMICK, Field Office Director of the ICE Office of Detention and Removal, in his official and individual capacity and JAMES A. DINKINS, Special Agent in Charge of the ICE Office of Investigations, Baltimore, MD, in his official and individual capacity
Roxana Santos v. Julie Meyer
as 10-2101
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROXANA ORELLANA SANTOS
Defendant - Appellant: JULIE L. MEYERS, former Assistant Secretary for Homeland Security of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in her official and individual capacity, CALVIN MCCORMICK, Field Office Director of the ICE Office of Detention and Removal, in his official and individual capacity and JAMES A. DINKINS, Special Agent in Charge of the ICE Office of Investigations, Baltimore, MD, in his official and individual capacity
Defendant: FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CHARLES JENKINS, Frederick County Sheriff, in his official and individual capacity, KEVIN LYNCH, Frederick County Deputy Sheriffs, in their official and individual capacities and others
Elwood v. US Federal Bureau of Investigations et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00018
Plaintiff: Doreen Elwood
Defendant: US Federal Bureau of Investigations and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Salim Hakimi v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-2388
Plaintiff - Appellant: SALIM HAKIMI
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARY LOISELLE, Field Office Director for Detention & Removal, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in her individual capacity and DOES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?