Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Daniel Jamison v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6132
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, MARK AMONETTE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A., RD., State Wide Dietician and others
Jamison v. Clarke, et al.
as 3:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Jamison
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Mark Amonette, MD, Natarcha Gregg, M.S.A, RD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Clarke et al
as 3:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Jamison
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, David Robinson, Mark Amonette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orozco et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01489
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1 through 10, City of New York and Salvator Improta
Plaintiff:
Ephraim Taylor, Devin Rodriguez, Victoria Orozco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06404
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Improta v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04387
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Improta
Defendant:
City Of New York, Rupert Fullerton, Khin Kyu, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Improta v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04648
Defendant:
City of New York, DOC Officer R. Fullerton, DOC Supervisors John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Improta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPRINGER et al v. IMPROTA et al
as 3:2015cv01938
Plaintiff:
HOWARD SPRINGER and KEVIN SPRINGER
Defendant:
ROSE IMPROTA and RAYMOND A. FASANO
Counter_claimant:
RAYMOND A. FASANO and ROSE IMPROTA
Counter_defendant:
HOWARD SPRINGER and KEVIN SPRINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
