Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jennifer Power v. State of Arizona, et al
as 21-16436
Plaintiff / Appellant: JENNIFER POWER, on behalf of herself, all statutory beneficiaries of decedent Monnie Washburn, and the Estate of Monnie Washburn
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF ARIZONA, a governmental entity, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., a Missouri corporation, doing business in the State of Arizona, CORIZON, INC., a Missouri corporation, doing business in the State of Arizona and others
Thomas Ireland v. Bill Prummell, et al
as 20-10539
Defendant / Appellee: TABBATHA CARTER, individually, Watch Commander at the Charlotte County Jail, ADAMAR GONZALEZ-FIGUEROA, MARGARET BRACY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS B. IRELAND, as personal representative of the estate of Gregg T. Ireland, on behalf of the estate and the survivors, Karen E. Ireland and Thomas B. Ireland
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00583
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Joiner v. Hennepin County Board et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2017cv01452
Plaintiff: Eugene Vincent Joiner
Defendant: Hennepin County Board, Hennepin County Sheriff Dept., Hennepin County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinet v. County of Onondaga
as 14-45
Plaintiff - Appellant: Tashara Pinet, Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Raul Pinet, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: County of Onondaga, Kevin E. Walsh, in his individual and official capacity as the Sheriff of Ononaga County, Onondaga County Sheriff's Office and others
Kimonii Gipson v. B. Cash, et al
as 12-55267
Plaintiff - Appellant: KIMONII DESHAWN GIPSON
Defendant - Appellee: B. M. CASH, Warden, individual, MARTINEZ, individual (Lieutenant of CDCR-Lancaster), R. FRANKLIN, individual, Sergeant of CDCR (Lancaster) and others
Noel Smith v. E. Smith, et al
as 10-56095
Plaintiff - Appellant: NOEL RAY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee: E. J. SMITH, individual, Correctional Officer, S. R. STINSON, individual, Correctional Lieutenant, R. BERTHOUD, individual, 2nd Level Appeals Examiner and others
Noel Smith v. E. Smith, et al
as 10-55980
Plaintiff - Appellant: NOEL RAY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee: E. J. SMITH, individual, Correctional Officer, S. R. STINSON, individual, Correctional Lieutenant, R. BERTHOUD, individual, 2nd Level Appeals Examiner and others
Sandy Krout v. Lee Goemmer, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-2815
Plaintiff - Appellee: Sandy Krout, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Bobby Joe Rylee, deceased, andsurvivors other
Defendant - Appellant: Lee Goemmer, individually, Police Officer for the City of Russellville, Bobby Stevens, individually, Police Officer for the City of Russellville, Keith Spears, individually, Police Officer for the City of Russellville and others
Defendant: Luke Sawdy, individually, Supervisor of Jail for Pope County, Chris Ketcherside, individually, Correctional Officer for Pope County, Arkansas, Chris Johnston, individually, Correctional Officer for Pope County, Arkansas and others
Sandy Krout v. Luke Sawdy, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-2781
Plaintiff - Appellee: Sandy Krout, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Bobby Joe Rylee, deceased, andsurvivors other
Defendant: Lee Goemmer, individually, Police Officer for the City of Russellville, Bobby Stevens, individually, Police Officer for the City of Russellville, Keith Spears, individually, Police Officer for the City of Russellville and others
Defendant - Appellant: Luke Sawdy, individually, Supervisor of Jail for Pope County, Chris Ketcherside, individually, Correctional Officer for Pope County, Arkansas, Chris Johnston, individually, Correctional Officer for Pope County, Arkansas and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?