Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tanya Winters v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, et al
as 22-16621
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TANYA WINTERS
Defendant / Appellee:
INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Winters v. Industrial Commission of Arizona et al
as 2:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
Industrial Commission of Arizona and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clervrain et al v. United States of America, National Labor Relations Board et al
as 5:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Nathalie Jean Baptiste Clervrain
Defendant:
United States of America, National Labor Relations Board, Commonwealth of Kentucky Labor Cabinet, State of Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FARLOUGH v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA et al
as 1:2020cv00830
Defendant:
LAURA CROFUTT, LIBERTY TRANSPORT, LLC, ALI HAKIM MESIWALA and others
Plaintiff:
DEXTER SC FARLOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05288
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Winters v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2015cv00539
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, United States District Court, AHCCCS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-16010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-17407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
