Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 67
United States of America et al v. DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff: United States of America and Foundation Building Materials, LLC
Defendant: DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc., DMS-BKL Drywall and Interior Systems, Inc, DMS-STL Drywall and Interior Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Painters District Council No. 58 v. Valley Interior Systems, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01350
Plaintiff: Painters District Council No. 58
Defendant: Valley Interior Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
Bray v. Faurecia Interior Systems Inc.
as 4:2023cv00697
Plaintiff: Micael Bray
Defendant: Faurecia Interior Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. et al v. Patriot Construction et al
as 3:2023cv04743
Plaintiff: DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Patriot Construction and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023at00589
Plaintiff: DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Solpac Construction, Inc. dba Soltek Pacific Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03505
Plaintiff: District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant: DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and David Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc., et al. v. Solpac Construction, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01050
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Solpac Construction, Inc. a California Corporation Doing business as Soltek Pacific Construction Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund et al v. Kleckner Interior Systems, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02106
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Deferred Savings Fund and others
Defendant: Kleckner Interior Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00090
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Kellstrom Commercial Aerospace, Inc. v. Safran Cabin Galleys US, Inc.
as 8:2021cv01805
Defendant: SAFRAN CABIN GALLEYS US, INC., a California Corporation formerly known as Driessen Aircraft Interior Systems, Inc. doing business as Zodiac Galleys USA, Driessen Aircraft Interior Systems, Inc. doing business as Zodiac Galleys USA and Safran Cabin Galleys US, Inc. a California Corporation formerly known as Driessen Aircraft Interior Systems, Inc. doing business as Zodiac Galleys USA
Plaintiff: KELLSTROM COMMERCIAL AEROSPACE, INC., a Delaware Corporation and Kellstrom Commercial Aerospace, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?