Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Barnes v. Zitman
as 23-20484
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Micheal W. Barnes
Defendant / Appellee:
John E. Zitman, Diane Hill, Larry Finley and others
Barnes v. Zitman et al
as 4:2023cv02846
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL W. BARNES
Defendant:
ASST. CHIEF JOHN E. ZITMAN, DEPUTY DIANE HILL, LIEUTENANT LARRY FINLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reed v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Reuben Reed
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Jessica Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madrid v. Graf et al
as 1:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Ombudsman Offices, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Internal Affairs Division, Bryan P. McDonald and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Madrid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slone v. Harbor Loans of Clinton, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00510
Defendant:
Jane Doe, AAG, Zack Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Slone, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke v. Moss et al
as 4:2020cv01251
Defendant:
Robert Moss and Internal Affairs Division
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lee Duke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke v. Moss et al
as 4:2019cv03347
Defendant:
Robert Moss, City Of Houston, Houston Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lee Duke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig Mack v. TDCJ-CID, et al
as 17-40806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG MACK
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION DIVISION, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH, INTERNAL AFFAIRS DIVISION and others
Mack v. TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2017cv00345
Plaintiff:
Craig Mack
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID, UTMB, Internal Affairs Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clinton Ards v. Martin, et al
as 17-20151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLINTON ARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
MAJOR MARTIN, CAPTAIN DAVIDINSON, DUICE/MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
