Cases 11 - 20 of 314
Annamalai et al v. Reynolds et al
as 3:2023cv01210
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai, Parvathi Sivanadiyan and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Jacqueline H. Reynolds, Nathan Ravichandran, Viswanathan Lakshmanan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Anderson v. United States Department of Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
Tonya R. Anderson
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402 Refund of Taxes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gates v. Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2021cv04189
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Gates
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steger et al v. Tsinman
as 1:2021cv05705
Plaintiff:
Douglas Steger and Sharon Steger
Defendant:
Michael Tsinman
3Rd Party Defendant:
United States of America and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Oliver v. USA, et al
as 3:2021cv01114
Plaintiff:
King Michael Oliver
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Health and Family Services, Dan Gobert, Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smerling v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2021cv02741
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Smerling
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reidy et al v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv02329
Plaintiff:
John P. Reidy and Ellen M. Reidy
Defendant:
United States of America (Internal Revenue Service) and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Sharples v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2021cv00335
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sharples
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Davis v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2021cv01098
Plaintiff:
Javaughnna M. Davis
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
