Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 291
Board of Trustees of the Inland Empire IBEW-NECA Trust Fund et al v. ACS Engineering, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv01013
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Inland Empire IBEW-NECA Trust Fund, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ELECTRICAL EDUCATIONAL AND TRAINING TRUST FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INLAND EMPIRE IBEW-NECA LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION COMMITTEE TRUST and others
Defendant: ACS Engineering, Inc., a California Corporation, Babak Kavoossi and ACS Engineering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Christopher Deering v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, et al
as 22-55458
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER DEERING
Defendant / Appellee: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 18, an employee organization, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a public agency, ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and others
Arnold Contreras, et al v. ASARCO LLC, et al
as 22-15406
Plaintiff: ARNOLD CONTRERAS, TONY M. MEZA, CHARLES M. ESTRADA and others
Defendant / Appellee: ASARCO LLC and ASARCO RETIREE MEDICAL PLAN
Not Yet Classified: MILLWRIGHTS AND MACHINE ERECTORS LOCAL 1607, successor in interest Local 1914 Millwright
Cross Defendant: LOCAL 627 BOILERMAKERS, IRON SHIPBUILDERS, BLACKSMITH, FORGER AND HELPERS, LOCALS 518,570 AND 602 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 518 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS and others
Thryv, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
as 22-15397
Plaintiff / Appellant: THRYV, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 1269
Arnold Contreras, et al v. ASARCO LLC, et al
as 22-15388
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARNOLD CONTRERAS, TONY M. MEZA, CHARLES M. ESTRADA and others
Defendant / Appellee: ASARCO LLC and ASARCO RETIREE MEDICAL PLAN
Not Yet Classified: LOCAL 627 BOILERMAKERS, IRON SHIPBUILDERS, BLACKSMITH, FORGER AND HELPERS, LOCALS 518,570 AND 602 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 518 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS and others
de Boer et al v. Nawman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv00203
Plaintiff: Monique de Boer, Nick Carpenter, Collection Committee of the Southern Oregon IBEW-NECA Electrical Workers Audit Committee and others
Defendant: Daniel Lee Nawman doing business as Dan's Electric
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Fund
Christopher Deering v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 18 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv07447
Plaintiff: Christopher Deering
Defendant: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 18, City of Los Angeles, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taft-Hartley Trust Funds et al v. K&F Electric Incorporated
as 2:2021cv01253
Plaintiff: Taft-Hartley Trust Funds, IBEW Local Union No 640 and Arizona Chapter NECA Health&Welfare Fund, IBEW Local Union No 640 and Arizona Chapter NECA Pension Fund and others
Defendant: K&F Electric Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Thryv, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1269 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv04280
Defendant: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1269
Plaintiff: Thryv, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
National Railroad Passenger Co, et al v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engi
as 21-15825
Intervenor Plaintiff: BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: TTX COMPANY, CENTRAL CALIFORNIA TRACTION COMPANY, LOS ANGELES JUNCTION RAILWAY and others
Defendant: JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as Labor Commissioner, State of California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?