Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Natl Assn of Immigration Judges v. David Neal
as 23-2235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF IMMIGRATION JUDGES, affiliated with the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID L. NEAL, in his official capacity as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review
Permanente Medical Group, Inc. et al v. Engineers and Scientists of California, Local 20, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, AFL-CIO & CLC
as 1:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
The Permanente Medical Group, Inc., Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Permanente Medical Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Engineers and Scientists of California, Local 20, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, AFL-CIO & CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. et al v. Engineers and Scientists of California, Local 20, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, AFL-CIO & CLC
as 1:2022at00354
Plaintiff:
The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
Defendant:
Engineers and Scientists of California, Local 20, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, AFL-CIO & CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
FOXWORTH et al v. SOUTH JERSEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2022cv02583
Plaintiff:
TYRONE FOXWORTH, DORIS HAMILTON, KAREN HAIRSTON and others
Defendant:
SOUTH JERSEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, STEPHEN F. DOUGHERTY and INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL ENGINEERS, LOCAL 196
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
National Association of Immigration Judges v. FLRA
as 22-1028
Petitioner:
National Association of Immigration Judges, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers Judicial Council 2
Respondent:
Federal Labor Relations Authority
Natl Assoc Immigration Judges v. James McHenry, III
as 20-1868
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF IMMIGRATION JUDGES, affiliated with the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES R. MCHENRY, III, in his official capacity as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION and LABOR LAW SCHOLARS AND EXPERTS
National Association of Immigration Judges, affiliated with the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers v. James R. McHenry, III, in his official capacity as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review
as 1:2020cv00731
Plaintiff:
National Association of Immigration Judges, affiliated with the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers
Defendant:
James R. McHenry, III, in his official capacity as Director of the exeecutive Office for Immigration Review and James R. McHenry, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ASSOCIATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES, INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL ENGINEERS, AFL-CIO v. FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL et al
as 1:2020cv01026
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES and ASSOCIATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES, INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL ENGINEERS, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
MARK ANTHONY CARTER and FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL
Intervenor Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KOPIE v. INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL ENGINEERS, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 195 et al
as 1:2019cv13483
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KOPIE
Defendant:
PAULA B. VOOS, JOHN BONANNI, PHIL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IUE-CWA, et al v. GE
as 17-3885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL SALARIED, MACHINE AND COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, IUE - CWA GE AND AEROSPACE CONFERENCE BOARD, UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
