Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kelly v. Scott Cook Intuit
as 3:2023cv00694
Plaintiff:
Dolores Kelly
Defendant:
Scott Cook Intuit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Subpoena to Alliance Healthcare Partners LLC
as 3:2022mc80314
In Re:
Subpoena to Alliance Healthcare Partners LLC
Plaintiff:
Da Vinci Surgical Robot Antitrust Litigation
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical Incorporated
Petitioner:
Alliance Healthcare Partners LLC
Subpoena to Alliance Healthcare Partners LLC
as 2:2022mc00033
In Re:
Subpoena to Alliance Healthcare Partners LLC
Plaintiff:
Da Vinci Surgical Robot Antitrust Litigation
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical Incorporated
Petitioner:
Alliance Healthcare Partners LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Levinson v. Intuit, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02477
Plaintiff:
Alan Levinson
Defendant:
Intuit, Inc. and Rocket Science Group, LLC d/b/a Mailchimp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Sauermilch Perez v. Chatholic Health Intuitive
as 4:2022cv03051
Plaintiff:
Tanya Sauermilch Perez
Defendant:
Chatholic Health Intuitive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Intuit Inc.
as 3:2022cv01973
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Intuit Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Fund Transfer Act
BNP Holdings LLC v. Intuit Inc.
as 1:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
BNP Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Intuit Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.