Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Villarreal et al v. Salesforce.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
David Villarreal, Joseph Douillard, Chris Simonelli and others
Defendant:
Salesforce.com, Inc., Board of Directors of Salesforce.com, Inc., Marc Benioff and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Brown et al v. The MITRE Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv10976
Plaintiff:
Aaron L. Brown, Peter A. Young, Nina Daniel and others
Defendant:
The MITRE Corporation, The Board of Trustees of The MITRE Corporation, The Investment Advisory Committee of The MITRE Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Brown v. The MITRE Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv11605
Plaintiff:
Aaron Brown
Defendant:
The MITRE Corporation, The Board of Trustees of The MITRE Corporation, The Investment Advisory Committee of The MITRE Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Kohari et al v. MetLife Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06146
Plaintiff:
Rita Kohari, John Radolec and Mohani Jaikaran
Defendant:
MetLife Group, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Benefit Plans Investment Advisory Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Tim Davis, et al v. CRM, et al
as 21-15867
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMANDA BREDLOW, GREGOR MIGUEL and TIM DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SALESFORCE.COM, INC., MARC R. BENIOFF, JOSEPH ALLANSON and others
Miguel et al v. Salesforce.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01753
Defendant:
Marc Benioff, Board of Directors of Salesforce.com, Inc., Joachim Wettermark and others
Plaintiff:
Tim Davis, Amanda Bredlow and Gregor Miguel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
CLARK et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2016cv01044
Plaintiff:
DAVID CLARK , KEITH A FEATHER , JORGE LOPEZ and others
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY and DUKE INVESTMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
