Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Rivera Rivera et al v. Innovation Construction Hercules, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv01547
Plaintiff:
Marvin Rivera Rivera, Yoendris Matos de Moya, Fredy Osmon Lopez and others
Defendant:
Innovation Construction Hercules, LLC and Lester F. Hercules Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ismael Gomez v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03133
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ismael Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GOMEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv81672
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ISMAEL GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446
Mounts v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv00808
Plaintiff:
Josefina Mounts
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and MetLife, Inc.
Third_party_defendant:
Josephine Mounts and Ismael Gomez
Counter_claimant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Josefina Mounts
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00946
Plaintiff:
Ismael Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gomez #16668-040 v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00839
Plaintiff:
Ismael Gomez #16668-040, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Ismael Gomez, Jr.
as 13-1639
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ISMAEL GOMEZ, JR.
Ismael Gomez Zelaya v. Carolyn W Colvin
as 5:2013cv00333
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Ismael Gomez Zelaya
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
