Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ruiz v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-8021
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMAEL RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, in his official capacity, AKA Dan Shannon, WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS HONOR FARM CAPTAIN, in his official capacity, AKA Ethan Remacle, WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS HONOR FARM CASE WORKER, in her official capacity, AKA Karla Scott and others
Ruiz v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Director et al
as 2:2023cv00013
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Farm Corrections Officer, Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Farm Case Worker and others
Plaintiff:
Ismael Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Lavery, et al
as 21-8014
Defendant / Appellee:
D. RICHARD HELSON and RICHARD L. LAVERY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMAEL RUIZ
Ruiz v. Lavery et al
as 0:2021cv00001
Defendant:
D Richard Helson and Richard L Lavery
Plaintiff:
Ismael Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Gonzalez (Antonio Gonzalez)
as 20-2010
Defendant:
Jose Manuel Rios, Charles May, Andre Miller and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Antonio Gonzalez, AKA Bienve
Appellee:
United States of America
United States of America v. Gonzalez (Bienvenido Gonzalez)
as 18-1059
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Antonio Gonzalez, AKA Bienve, Luis Gonzalez, Herson Gonzalez, AKA Titi and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Bienvenido Gonzalez, AKA Antonio, AKA Julian
ZUNIGA v. PERRY
as 1:2015cv00293
Petitioner:
JOSE ISMAEL RUIZ ZUNIGA
Respondent:
FRANK L. PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ZUNIGA v. PERRY
as 1:2015cv00035
Petitioner:
JOSE ISMAEL RUIZ ZUNIGA
Respondent:
FRANK PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ZUNIGA v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2014cv01064
Petitioner:
JOSE ISMAEL RUIZ ZUNIGA
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
