Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Case Filed In Error.
as 0:2013cv01242
Defendant:
Robi J. Briggs and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Briggs et al
as 0:2013cv01243
Defendant:
Robi J. Briggs , John Doe and Mary Roe
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zeng v. Potts et al
as 4:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Sherman H. Zeng
Defendant:
Hugh S. Potts, Jr., Jeffrey B. Lacey, Michael L. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Rebecca C. Robinson, et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 13-1443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rebecca C. Robinson, Edward B. Hughes, David B. Larsen and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America, N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Briggs v. Hancock et al
as 3:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Briggs
Defendant:
Robert D. Hancock, Aaron E. Cobb, Joseph F. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Melissa J. Briggs, Esq.
as 1:2013mc00150
Respondent:
Melissa J. Briggs
Cause Of Action: Disciplinary Proceedings
Robert Briggs v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 13-10477
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT J. BRIGGS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Pitchford v. King et al
as 3:2012cv01879
Correctional Officer:
J. Briggs
Uperintendent:
J. Decamp
Grievance Coordinator:
M. Giels
ODOC Assitant Director:
M. Gower
Sergant:
R. King
Plaintiff:
Brent Gordon Pitchford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv01353
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
