Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Loper et al v. Lukis et al
as 1:2024cv20604
Plaintiff:
Council President ELIZABETH A LOPER, Alderman KEITH J BLACK, Alderman KATHLEEN M GROSS and others
Defendant:
Commissioner PATRICIA PETRONE, Ashley Lukis, Michelle Anchors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLACK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01356
Plaintiff:
JERLE J BLACK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Black v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv17557
Plaintiff:
Howard J. Black, Jr.
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin-Burge v. Cullman County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv01192
Plaintiff:
Shallowmist Martin-Burge
Defendant:
Cullman County Jail, J Black and Blount County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company
as 3:2020cv00805
Defendant:
The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Carl J Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brantley v. Cooks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00471
Plaintiff:
Lerome Brantley
Defendant:
Mary Cooks, Warden Thomas, Captain King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith-West v. Santos et al
as 8:2016cv01199
Plaintiff:
Darrell Smith-West
Defendant:
J. Santos, R. Bingham and Don J. Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
