Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ottele v. Martinez, et al.
as 23-3084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN OTTELE, on her own behalf and on behalf of the Estate of Adam J. Collier, decedent
Defendant / Appellee:
OSCAR MARTINEZ and AARON HODGES
Thompson v. Collier
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Thompson
Defendant:
Melissa J Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier v. Lewis et al
as 3:2021cv00461
Defendant:
Charles Taylor and Victor C. Lewis
Plaintiff:
Darren J Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier et al v. City of Union City
as 3:2021cv00462
Plaintiff:
Mr Darren J Collier, Mr. Victor C. Lewis, Victor C. Lewis and others
Defendant:
City of Union City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03760
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Terry J Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collier v. Howell et al
as 2:2018cv01955
Respondent:
Jerry Howell and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Kendrick J. Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gregory Smith v. M. Roennmann, et al
as 18-15238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY ANDRE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
M. ROENNMANN, Correctional Officer at S.V.S.P., M. MEJAI, Correctional Officer at S.V.S.P., A. MIRAMONTES, Correctional Officer at S.V.S.P. and others
Gregory Smith v. Anthony Hedgpeth, et al
as 17-17009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY ANDRE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, L. TREXLER, Associate Warden of S.V.S.P., R. MACHUCA, Jr., Correctional Sergeant at S.V.S.P. and others
Smith v. Hedgpeth et al
as 5:2016cv01269
Plaintiff:
Gregory Andre Smith
Defendant:
R. Machuca, Jr., M. Zornes, M. Roennmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Hedrick et al
as 5:2015cv03003
Plaintiff:
James Marion Sims
Defendant:
B. Hedrick, Tomasian and J. Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
