Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Roosevelt Smith v. Cell Search Team, et al
as 24-11006
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT SMITH
Defendant:
CELL SEARCH TEAM, DALE VAUGHN, BOBBY J. GREEN and others
Roosevelt Smith v. J Lott, et al
as 24-10986
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT SMITH
Defendant:
J LOTT, LIEUTENANT RITENOUR and HIGHLANDS COUNTY, FLORIDA
Smith v. Lott et al
as 2:2023cv14246
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Shavon Smith, III
Defendant:
J. Lott, Lieutenant Ritenour and Highlands County, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Coakley et al
as 3:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Raul Ortiz
Defendant:
LT D. Coakley, CT M. Duff, LT D. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Cell Search Team et al
as 2:2022cv14421
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Shavon Smith, III
Defendant:
Cell Search Team, Dale Vaughn, Bobby J. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
United States of America v. Murphy
as 21-1811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony Murphy, AKA Supreme
Defendant:
Damien J. Lott, Shawn Rucker, AKA Divine, Terrance Stinson, AKA T-Rock and others
United States of America v. Murphy
as 21-1750
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Damien J. Lott, Shawn Rucker, AKA Divine, Terrance Stinson, AKA T-Rock and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Murphy, AKA Supreme
United States of America v. Murphy (Stinson)
as 20-3744
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jason Perry, Damien J. Lott, Anthony Murphy, AKA Supreme and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Terrance Stinson, AKA T-Rock
Louis v. Joyner et al
as 1:2020cv05756
Defendant:
. Hubbard, J Lott, N. Cruze and others
Plaintiff:
Raheem Louis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
