Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Ronald Chavis v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 13-1556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
David Biggs, Sr. v. Nora Hunt
as 12-7145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID Q. BIGGS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NORA HUNT, HOMER BLACKWELL, Correctional Officer, BILLY STRICKLAND, Correctional Officer and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MCCARTHY, RICKY CRIBB, Sergeant, SERGEANT HARRIS and others
Keith Powell v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 12-13509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH J. POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SANTA ROSA CI WARDEN
DIXON v. POWELL et al
as 2:2012cv02657
Petitioner:
BRENT DIXON
Respondent:
KENNETH J. POWELL, JR., SETH WILLIAMS and RICHARD SAX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
POWELL v. TUCKER et al
as 3:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
KEITH J POWELL
Defendant:
KENNETH TUCKER and DAVID ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2012cv00674
Plaintiff:
Frank J. Powell
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Biggs v. Hunt et al
as 5:2011ct03215
Plaintiff:
David Q. Biggs, Sr.
Defendant:
Nora Hunt, Lt. McCarthy, Ricky Cribb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. GARCIA et al
as 2:2010cv05575
Plaintiff:
FREDERIC J. POWELL
Defendant:
GARCIA, MIKE NUTTER, MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Board of County Commissioners et al
as 0:2010cv62015
Plaintiff:
Keith J. Powell
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners, Broward County Commissioners, Government Center for Broward County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Daniels
as 1:2010cv00723
Petitioner:
Samuel J. Powell
Respondent:
Charles Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
