Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Carty v. Testamark et al
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Chris Carty
Defendant:
W. Testamark, B. Adams, J. Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago-Velez v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv01416
Plaintiff:
Zulma J. Santiago-Velez
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Walter Young, Jr. v. Township of Irvington, et al
as 13-4353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER W. YOUNG, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAROLD C. BORK, JR. and others
Walter Young, Jr. v. Township of Irvington, et al
as 13-1690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER W. YOUNG, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAROLD C. BORK, JR. and others
Walter Young, Jr. v. Township of Irvington, et al
as 12-3592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER W. YOUNG, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAROLD C. BORK, JR. and others
YOUNG v. TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON et al
as 2:2011cv06855
Plaintiff:
WALTER W. YOUNG, JR.
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON , IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT , HAROLD C. BORK, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANTIAGO v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51571
Plaintiff:
MARINO J. SANTIAGO
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
OWENS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv04329
Plaintiff:
STEVEN OWENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, HOOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tejada et al v. Southers et al
as 3:2007cv00207
Plaintiff:
Ricky Tejada, Carrington Alan Keys, Shawn Presley and others
Defendant:
Richard Southers, Edward Kaisk, Robert Krieder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:1997cv06184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
