Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Simpson v. Cox et al
as 2:2024cv00611
Not Yet Classified:
Christopher J. Simpson
Defendant:
Katherine E. Cox, Victoria Stelfox, Vincent Wynne Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Simpson et al v. Evolve Federal Credit Union
as 3:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Carlos J Simpson, Maria G Simpson, Carlos J. Simpson and others
Defendant:
Evolve Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Simpson v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10674
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Myra J. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanford et al v. Liberty Mutual Group Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00096
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline E. Stanford and Roy Stanford, Sr.
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Group Inc. , Ward J. Simpson and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett et al v. Auxilius Heavy Industries LLC et al
as 3:2017cv02675
Plaintiff:
Gayle Lewis Bennett and Hubert Lee Lewis, Jr
Defendant:
Auxilius Heavy Industries LLC and Kurtis J Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett et al v. Auxilius Heavy Industries LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Gayle Lewis Bennett and Hubert Lee Lewis, Jr
Defendant:
Auxilius Heavy Industries LLC and Kurtis J Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson et al v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's et al
as 4:2010cv03813
Plaintiff:
Shirley J. Simpson and Terry G. Simpson
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyd's , Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc. , Sharon McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Riches v. Howe et al
as 2:2010cv00226
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Howe, Amanda Hughes and Residential Drug Abuse Program
Movant:
Patrick J. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
