Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cason v. Kelley et al
as 1:2017cv01019
Plaintiff:
Kevin S Cason
Defendant:
Brandon Kelley, Matt Brooks, J W Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cason v. Kelley et al
as 4:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
Kevin S Cason
Defendant:
Brandon Kelley, Matt Brooks, J W Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teague v. Kelley, et al
as 4:2016cv00018
Plaintiff:
Chip J W Teague
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley and Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2015cv03062
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen
Defendant:
Paul Woodruff, J W Saller, Mike Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Woodruff et al
as 4:2015cv00480
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen
Defendant:
Paul Woodruff, J W Saller, Mike Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 2:2010cv00101
Plaintiff:
Guy Clayton Barnes
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Burls, Belkens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Arkansas, State of, et al
as 4:1978cv00025
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of , Douglas W Harp , Lawrence E Gwyn and others
Intervenor:
Wendell Adams , Larry Astin , Ron Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Townsend v. Golden et al
as 5:2008cv00260
Plaintiff:
Antonio Paviese Townsend
Defendant:
Ernest Golden, J W Green, Vickie Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harman v. Bill et al
as 2:2007cv00136
Plaintiff:
James Lesley Harman
Defendant:
J W Bill, G Harmon and Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. AC & S Inc, et al
as 4:1995cv00542
Plaintiff:
Neal Cook
Defendant:
Allied Signal Inc, Anchor Packing Company , Asbestos Claims Management Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Rock Wool Manufacturing Company Inc
Cross_defendant:
National Gypsum Company, Triple P Corporation, Ameriflex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
