Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Cleveland v. Toni et al
as 2:2024cv02331
Defendant: Rodriguez, Vaughn, J. Alvarez and others
Plaintiff: Tommie Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ibarra v. Nanos et al
as 4:2024cv00578
Defendant: J Alvarez, MJ Veluz and Chris Nanos
Plaintiff: Lawrence Ibarra, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hydraulic Mudpumps Inc v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2024cv01341
Defendant: Infraestructure Technologies Inc doing business as Intec Corporation, NDT-HDS Inc, The Neogenesis Group of Companies Inc and others
Plaintiff: Hydraulic Mudpumps Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Cuong Huy Dao v. D. Chamberlain et al
as 2:2024cv07000
Defendant: C. Gonzalos, J. Blanco, G. Hernandez and others
Plaintiff: Cuong Huy Dao
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deshone M. Lacey Jr. v. M. Felts et al
as 8:2024cv00816
Plaintiff: Deshone M. Lacey Jr.
Defendant: M. Felts, Don Barnes, K. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacey Jr. v. Felts et al
as 3:2024cv00476
Plaintiff: Deshone M. Lacey Jr.
Defendant: M. Felts, Don Barnes, K. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06033
Plaintiff: Natalie J. Alvarez Hernandez
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dean, Ivan v. Mrs. Green et al
as 1:2024cv20208
Plaintiff: Ivan Charles Dean
Defendant: Mrs. Green, Ms. McMullen, J. Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Mattos
as 24-246
Petitioner: ISRAEL J. ALVAREZ
Respondent: JOHN MATTOS
Dorlette v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2023cv01589
Plaintiff: Faroulh Dorlette
Defendant: City of Stamford, Christopher Baker, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?