Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Deandre Baskerville v. Tim McConahay
as 22-3427
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEANDRE J. BASKERVILLE
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden
BASKERVILLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01969
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARRNELL J BASKERVILLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baskerville v. City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2019cv00420
Defendant:
Stephen Mowery, Kevin M. Scott, Dauphin County and others
Plaintiff:
Ronsheek J. Baskerville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baskerville v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 1:2018cv02395
Petitioner:
Ronsheek J. Baskerville
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baskerville v. Turner
as 5:2018cv02277
Petitioner:
Deandre J. Baskerville
Respondent:
Warden Neil Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perry v. Revell et al
as 5:2011ct03132
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Perry
Defendant:
Sarah Revell, Delores Stephens, J. Baskerville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Stevens et al
as 5:2011ct03115
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Perry
Defendant:
Delores Stevens, Terry Kilpatrick and J. Baskerville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luckman v. Sears Roebuck & Co et al
as 2:2008cv01058
Plaintiff:
Thomas Luckman, Thomas Luckman, Thomas Luckman and others
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co, Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Movant:
Matthew J Baskerville
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Matthew J Baskerville
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Baskerville v. Sears Roebuck & Co et al
as 2:2008cv01057
Plaintiff:
Matthew J Baskerville
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co, Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Baskerville v. Sears, Roebuck and Company et al
as 3:2008cv00385
Plaintiff:
Matthew J Baskerville
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
