Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Johnson v. Weathercheck, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00709
Plaintiff:
J. Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Weathercheck, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Megatel Homes LLC et al v. Moayedi et al
as 3:2020cv00688
Defendant:
Hollis M Greenlaw, United Development Funding LP, United Development Funding, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Megatel Homes LLC, Megatel Homes III, LLC, Megatel Homes II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cadence Education, Inc. v. Vore, et al.
as 2:2018mc00208
Defendant:
James L. Vore , Patricia M. Vore , J. Brandon Vore and others
Plaintiff:
Cadence Education, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 4:2018mc09004
Plaintiff:
Cadence Education, LLC
Defendant:
J. Brandon Vore, Sarah Vore and FHD, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type:
Other Statutes
Cadence Education, Inc. v. Vore, et al.
as 4:2018mc00252
Defendant:
James L. Vore , Patricia Vore , J. Brandon Vore and others
Plaintiff:
Cadence Education, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
In Re: Ezekiel Frederick
as 16-2789
Petitioner:
Ezekiel Frederick
Respondent:
Pinnacle Financial Services, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., Verizon Wireless and others
Hay v United Development Fund IV, et al
as 4:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
Mark Hay
Defendant:
United Development Funding IV, UMT Services, Inc., UMTH General Services, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
