Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Michael Bargo, Jr. v. Ryan Ruiz, et al
as 26-13260
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHANE BARGO, JR.
Defendant:
RYAN RUIZ, JAMIE MANUCY, MICHAEL BROWN and others
Cusco Consulting Group, LLC et al v. CI Tech Ventures, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv10090
Plaintiff:
Cusco Consulting Group, LLC and Alejandro Cusco
Defendant:
CI Tech Ventures, Inc., SEPC Holdings, LLC, Sherwin Estanislao and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-13110
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Morales-Rojas v. Department of Correction et al
as 3:2026cv01356
Plaintiff:
Agustin Morales-Rojas
Defendant:
Department of Correction, John Dempsey Hospital, Ventrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tropical Fruit Europe, L.L.C. et al v. Seatrade Group N.V. et al
as 2:2026cv01814
Plaintiff:
TROPICAL FRUIT EUROPE, L.L.C., DOLE EUROPE GMBH, STANDARD FRUIT COMPANY DE COSTA RICA and others
Defendant:
SEATRADE GROUP N.V., in personam, SOLE SEAS CORP, in personam, SEATRADE GRONINGEN BV, in personam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Ansel Johnson v. Director, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 26-12733
Plaintiff:
ANSEL WRE JOHNSON
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JEFFERSON CI WARDEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-12640
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JACKSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 5:2026cv00210
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JACKSON
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, RICKY D DIXON and GULF CI MAIN UNIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
