Cases 1 - 10 of 48
In Re: Gladu
as 21-1959
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Respondent:
ANTHONY J. HARDY, ZACHARY SWAIN, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
In Re: Gladu
as 21-1639
Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and JACOB ZERNICKI
Respondent:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ANTHONY J. HARDY, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Spine & Joint Surgical Institute of Michigan Southfield LLC v. Surgical Center of Southfield, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv11316
Defendant:
D.O. Mark L. Goldberger, Surgical Center of Southfield, LLC, D.O. Robert D. Swift and others
Plaintiff:
Spine & Joint Surgical Institute of Michigan Southfield LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv16967
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Michael Carroll
as 20-35814
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. CARROLL, tobor11313@yahoo.com
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wilson et al v. County of Lane et al
as 3:2020cv00321
Defendant:
Eugene 4J School District, Monique J. Carroll, County of Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Franklin Wilson and Jason Edward Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RYDER v. WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00248
Respondent:
MICHAEL J CARROLL, CHRISTOPHER V SALERNO, WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES LLC and others
Petitioner:
ROBERT F. RYDER
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
USA v. Michael Carroll
as 19-30053
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. CARROLL, AKA tobor11313@yahoo.com
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bruce Wishnefsky v. John Carroll, et al
as 19-1027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE L. WISHNEFSKY
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES J. RILEY and JOHN J. CARROLL
Blue Island Police Department et al v. Bey
as 1:2018cv02403
Plaintiff:
Blue Island Police Department, Sluzewicz Highwayman, State Of Illinois and others
Defendant:
El-Haj Malik Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
